Morgan v. Radiology, Ltd.

992 F.2d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Karl H. MORGAN, M.D. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIOLOGY, LTD., an Arizona partnership; HCA Health Services of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation; Hospital Corporation of America, a Tennessee corporation; Hospital Corporation of Arizona, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a El Dorado Hospital, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15326. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1993. Decided April 9, 1993. Before GOODWIN, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 This case began as an antitrust suit brought by several radiologists in the Tuscon area against the dominant radiology group in the city as well as several Tuscon hospitals. The complaint included federal as well as state antitrust claims. The district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on all counts of the plaintiffs' complaint except for the plaintiffs' attempt to monopolize claim.…