Grady Radford, Jr. v. Fred Pearce, Director of the Department of Corrections Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Grady RADFORD, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Fred PEARCE, Director of the Department of Corrections; Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellees. No. 93-35015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 5, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Grady Radford appeals pro se the district court's denial of (1) his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal from the court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, and (2) his motion to reconsider the court's order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Whale v. United States, 792 F.2d 951, 952 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm. 3 A notice of appeal from a district court's judgment denying a habeas petition must be filed within 30 days of the judgment. Fed.R.App.P.…