United States v. Irvine K. Leitch

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Irvine K. LEITCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50589. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 4, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Irvine K. Leitch appeals his sentence imposed following revocation of probation. He contends the district court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him because the term of probation had expired prior to the time to the alleged violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's assumption of jurisdiction. United States v. Daly, 839 F.2d 598, 599-600 (9th Cir.1988). 4 "The interpretation of a sentencing order is governed by the court's intent." United States v. Levitt, 799 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1986). "A defendant may simultaneously be on parole and probation." United States v. Laughlin,…