United States v. Allan Fuentes Sosa, United States of America v. Jaime Espinoza Leon, Aka: Jamie Leon Espinoza, United States of America v. Miguel Ortiz Pedraza

Good Law
992 F.2d 1220·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16334
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 199392-50050California3,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan Fuentes SOSA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime Espinoza LEON, aka: Jamie Leon Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Ortiz PEDRAZA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50050, 92-50061 and 92-50062. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1993. * Decided May 4, 1993. Before SCHROEDER, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The three appellants in this case--Allan Fuentes Sosa, Jaime Espinoza Leon, and Miguel Ortiz Pedraza--were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. All three now appeal their convictions challenging mainly (1) the stop of a vehicle occupied by Sosa, Pedraza, and a non-party codefendant; (2) the subsequent pat-down search of Sosa; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.