United States v. Jon Robert Perroton

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon Robert PERROTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 4, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jon R. Perroton appeals pro se from the district court's denial, without a hearing, of his second motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging his guilty plea conviction and sentence. He now contends the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, failed to comply with the provisions of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, and violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(f). Because we reject certain of Perroton's claims as successive and the remainder as abuses of the writ, we need not address the merits. Accordingly, we remand to the district court for dismissal of Perroton's second section 2255 motion. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 On April 8, 1985,…