Debi Reynolds v. State of Arizona

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Debi REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, et al, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 28, 1993. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this Title VII action alleging sex discrimination, Debi Reynolds appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the state of Arizona and several employees of the Arizona Department of Public Safety ("DPS"). We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. 3 * FACTS 4 Reynolds began working for DPS in 1981 and was a patrol officer from 1982 until January 7, 1986, when she resigned her position. Reynolds resigned because her infant daughter suffered from an illness that required her to be breast-fed, and Reynolds was unable to obtain a transfer to a position within DPS that would have accommodated this need. On October 8, 1986, Reynolds sought to be reinstated…