United States v. Jesse Gary Soliz

Good Law
992 F.2d 1220·1993 WL 133839·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199392-50327California727 words

Opinion

Opinion

992 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse Gary SOLIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided April 28, 1993. Before BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Soliz pleaded guilty to bail jumping and false statement. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 , 3146(a)(1). His plea agreement waived the right to appeal, but he appeals anyway, claiming inadequate findings regarding downward adjustments. The judge said "I will follow the plea agreement in its entirety," and did so. The government has moved to dismiss the appeal, because of Soliz's waiver of his right to appeal. Soliz opposes dismissal on the ground that the judge did not adequately advise him regarding his waiver of the right to appeal. 3 The plea agreement waived the right to appeal in plain English: 4 10. Defendant Waives His Right of Appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.