Sam S. Yakich v. Municipal Court of San Jose, Scc

992 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sam S. YAKICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF SAN JOSE, SCC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 4, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sam S. Yakich appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his action for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction and denying "all requests for relief" and prohibiting Yakich from filing any papers with the district court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part and vacate and remand in part 1 . 3 We review de novo the district court's determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear Yakich's action. See Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Co., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989); cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). The United States District Court, as a court of original…