Pedro Aponte v. James H. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections Attorney General for the State of California

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 6324·993 F.2d 705·1993 WL 160380·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11418·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199392-55937California1,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Pedro Aponte (Aponte), a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his habeas petition. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 , 2254. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 , 2253 and affirm.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Aponte was arrested on November 1,1987, for various drug offenses. He pled guilty to transportation of cocaine in violation of California Health & Safety Code (HSC) § 11352 (Count 1) and possession of cocaine for sale in violation of HSC § 11351.5 (Count 2). Aponte also conceded that the substance containing cocaine exceeded twenty-five pounds within the meaning of HSC § 11370.4(a).

Aponte was sentenced to a mid-term level of four years as to Count 1 and to a consecutive ten-year term pursuant to HSC § 11370.4(a)(3), for a total of fourteen years in prison. Aponte sought habeas relief contending that because his sentence exceeds twice the number of years imposed as a base level, he was sentenced in violation of California Penal Code § 1170.1(g) which, in 1987, did not permit a sentence in excess of twice the base term (i.e., eight years).

The district court denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.