Michael Bret v. United States

993 F.2d 881 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael BRET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-15801. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 13, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Bret, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence imposed following his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Bret contends that his guilty plea was involuntary because neither the district court nor his attorney advised him of a mandatory term of supervised release following his imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and we affirm. 3 We review a district court's denial of a section 2255 motion de novo. Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct.…