Andrisani v. Lucas

993 F.2d 881 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Malcolm LUCAS, Chief Justice; Stanley Mosk, Associate Justice; Allen Broussard, Associate Justice; Edward Panelli, Associate Justice; John A. Arguelles, Associate Justice, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56534. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 18, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Albert Andrisani appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim in Andrisani's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the justices of the California Supreme Court and various judges of the state's municipal, superior, and appellate courts. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3…