Thomas R. Blaesing v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration

Good Law
993 F.2d 881·1993 WL 169066·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18226
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199391-70740California1,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 881 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas R. BLAESING, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and Federal Aviation Administration, Respondents. No. 91-70740. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 15, 1993. Decided May 19, 1993. 1 Before: CANBY, FERGUSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Petitioner seeks review of the National Transportation Safety Board's order affirming a thirty day suspension of his Airline Transport Pilot certificate. Petition for review denied. I. 4 By order of October 12, 1988, the FAA suspended petitioner's pilot certificate for thirty days. 1 Petitioner appealed the order of suspension to the National Transportation Safety Board (Board). The FAA filed its Order of Suspension with the Board as the complaint and served a copy of the filing on petitioner. 5 The Board acknowledged receipt of petitioner's appeal notice by its letter of November 21, 1988. In this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.