Tena Evans v. Sue Ellen Clark, or Successor, Superintendent Wccw

993 F.2d 882 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tena EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sue Ellen CLARK, or successor, Superintendent; WCCW, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1993. * Decided May 12, 1993. Before SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tena Evans appeals pro se the district court's denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). She contends that the district court erred by rejecting her claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction; (2) she received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) she was denied her right to a jury reflective of a fair cross-section of the community. We reject these contentions and affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 Evans argues that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find her guilty of felony murder based on the underlying…