Arthur William Hite v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

993 F.2d 882w NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur William HITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55243. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 11, 1992. Decided May 17, 1993. NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION