Audrey J. Getrost v. United States of America, and Richard Hanson, Trustee

993 F.2d 882 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Audrey J. GETROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants, and Richard Hanson, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55475. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 6, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 Audrey J. Getrost appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim of her action against Richard Hanson. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). We affirm. 2 Getrost originally filed this action as a wrongful levy/quiet title action against the United States, Hanson, and other individual defendants. She alleged that property which was rightfully hers was seized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to…