Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Duvall

Good Law
993 F.2d 882·1993 WL 164869·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18284
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199392-36739California567 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 882 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FARM CREDIT BANK OF SPOKANE, a Corporation, Successor by Merger to the Federal Land Bank of Spokane, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel W. DUVALL and Roberta Z. Duvall, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-36739. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 18, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel and Roberta Duvall appeal pro se the district court's judgment of foreclosure and order of sale on their real property. The Duvalls filed their notice of appeal 95 days after entry of the judgment. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 3 A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Munden v. Ultra-Alaska Assocs., 849 F.2d 383 , 386 (9th Cir.1988). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) provides that in a civil case where the United States is a party, a notice of appeal must be filed with the clerk of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.