Edward G. Danley v. Robert G. Borg

993 F.2d 882 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward G. DANLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15773. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 7, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward G. Danley, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Danley contends that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the eighth amendment. He claims that prison officials' delay in treating him for a lump found under his breast following an earlier operation for cancer caused him emotional anxiety and stress. We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1603 (1992). We have…