Morgal v. Pinal County Bd. of Sup'rs

Good Law
993 F.2d 883·1993 WL 148088·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18398
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 199391-16577California704 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John MORGAL; Melinda K. Morgal, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PINAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; Ron Kent Hooper, Attorney at Law; Robert A. Webb, Individually and as Trustee of the Joseph R. Webb and Ethel W. Webb Trust; City of Apache Junction; William Mathieson; Roy Hudson; Dean Weatherly; Robert R. Bean, Presiding Judge; James E. Don, Judge of the Pinal County Superior Court; Jay Abbey, Judge of the Navajo County Superior Court (Visiting Judge); E.D. McBryde, Judge of the Pinal County Superior Court (Retired); et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 13, 1993. * Decided May 10, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John and Melinda Morgal (the "Morgals") appeal from the dismissal of their action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The Morgals contend that the district court erred in setting aside entry of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.