Jaami Abdul Mutakabbir v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union

Good Law
993 F.2d 883·1993 WL 159900·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18404
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 199392-17003California878 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jaami Abdul MUTAKABBIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jaami Abdul Mutakabbir appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 complaint against the defendants' Pacific Maritime Association (PMA), International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union (ILWU) and others. Mutakabbir contends that the district court erred by: (1) finding that he failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted; (2) finding that his action was time-barred; and (3) failing to give him an opportunity to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.