Helen Maxine McCanic v. City of Long Beach Marilou Newkirk

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Helen Maxine McCANIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH; Marilou Newkirk, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56470. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1993. Decided May 21, 1993. 1 Before NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD * , District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Helen Maxine McCanic appeals from the district court's dismissal of her complaint without leave to amend. The complaint alleged race and sex discrimination by McCanic's employer, the City of Long Beach, California, and her past supervisor, Marilou Newkirk. McCanic claimed a right to recovery under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, and the Reconstruction era civil rights acts, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983 and 1985. McCanic also asserted a cause of action under California law, Cal.Gov't Code § 12940, et seq. We affirm the district court's dismissal of the complaint. FACTS and PROCEEDINGS…