John Dennis O'sullivan, II v. James Stephensen, Ceps Richard Carter, Cso & Librarian

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Dennis O'SULLIVAN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James STEPHENSEN, CEPS; Richard Carter, CSO & Librarian, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 24, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Dennis O'Sullivan, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging he was denied access to the prison law library. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 "This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court applied the correct substantive law." Americana Trading Inc. v. Russ Berrie & Co.,…