Gilbert L. Lane v. Wesley Weissert Don Mills Ellie Lyttle Fred Pearce, Director Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Gilbert L. Lane v. Wesley Weissert Don Mills Ellie Lyttle Fred Pearce, Director Manfred Maass, Superintendent

Good Law
993 F.2d 883·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18411
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199391-36363California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gilbert L. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wesley WEISSERT; Don Mills; Ellie Lyttle; Fred Pearce, Director; Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees. Gilbert L. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wesley WEISSERT; Don Mills; Ellie Lyttle; Fred Pearce, Director; Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-36363, 91-36364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1993. * Decided May 19, 1993. 1 Before: PREGERSON, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, District Judge. ** 2 ORDER *** 3 Gilbert Lane appeals the district court's judgment in favor of defendant prison officials following a bench trial on Lane's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Defendant prison officials cross-appeal from the district court's order denying their motion for the return of interim attorney's fees. 4 The district court's order granting judgment in favor of defendants-appellees is AFFIRMED for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.