Luckett v. Rosenthal

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John LUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheri Lynnea ROSENTHAL; Breidenbach, Crispo, Swainston & Way; James Maxwell Smathers; Jim Smathers Cypress Nissan, Inc.; Brennan & Associates; Dena Yvette Weiman, et al., Defendants- Appellees. No. 92-55639. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 21, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Luckett appeals pro se the dismissal of his action alleging fraud in connection with (1) his purchase of an automobile from one of the defendants and (2) a state court decision vacating a default judgment in favor of Luckett against some of the defendants. The district court found that it had no subject matter jurisdiction over the action. We review de novo a district court's dismissal on jurisdictional grounds. Peter Starr Prod. Co. v. Twin Continental Films, Inc., 783 F.2d 1440, 1442 (9th…