Santos Ramon Murillo-Perez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

993 F.2d 883 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Santos Ramon MURILLO-PEREZ, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1993. * Decided May 10, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** Petitioner Santos Ramon Murillo-Perez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his application for asylum. The BIA took administrative notice of the change of government in Nicaragua and concluded that petitioner therefore had no well-founded fear of persecution from the Sandinistas. We recently held that the BIA may not take administrative notice on this issue without giving petitioner adequate warning and an opportunity to be heard. Castillo-Villagra v. I.N.S., 972 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir.1992). We must reach the same result here. We also reverse and remand the BIA's denial of…