United States v. Michael Avant

993 F.2d 884 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael AVANT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30254. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1993. * Decided May 14, 1993. 1 Before PREGERSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Michael Avant was convicted of robbing two banks, and was sentenced under the Guidelines to 210 months. He appeals his conviction and his sentence, arguing that: (1) the district court should have suppressed evidence seized when Avant was arrested and evidence discovered through the warrantless search of his car, (2) the district court should have granted his motion to sever, (3) the district court erred when it gave him a two level enhancement for obstruction of justice, and (4) the district court erred when it gave him a two level enhancement for his role in the offense. We affirm. FACTS 4 Avant was allegedly…