Gilberto Santos Panduro-Chanchabi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
993 F.2d 884·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18432
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 199391-70453California887 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 884 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gilberto Santos PANDURO-CHANCHABI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1993. * Decided May 10, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gilberto Santos Panduro Chanchabi (Panduro) seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying him discretionary relief from deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. section 1182 (c). Because we find the BIA reviewed the administrative record de novo and supported its conclusion with a reasoned explanation based upon legitimate concerns, we affirm. I. 3 Panduro is a 34-year-old native and citizen of Peru who was admitted to the United States on January 15, 1976, as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure. He was permitted to change his status to that of nonimmigrant student on July 29, 1976. On January 7, 1981, Panduro…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.