United States v. Roger Scott Campbell

Good Law
993 F.2d 885·1993 WL 152582·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18469
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 199392-35498California805 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Scott CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-35498. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1993. * Decided May 12, 1993. MEMORANDUM * 1 Before SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges 2 Roger Scott Campbell appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. He contends that the district court erred by not conducting an evidentiary hearing and by rejecting his contentions that his plea was involuntary and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Voluntariness of Guilty Plea 3 Campbell first contends that his plea was not voluntary because he disputed the government's summary of the evidence supporting the plea. He contends that the district court thereby failed to comply with provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 requiring the court to determine that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.