United States v. Alan R. Keranen

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan R. KERANEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50537. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alan R. Keranen appeals the district court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to the pre-November 1987 version of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). Keranen was convicted after guilty pleas to making a false statement in a loan application in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 . Keranen contends that the district court erred by denying his Rule 35 motion because the restitution order exceeded the amount permitted by law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 "We review the legality of a criminal sentence, de novo. If the sentence complies with statutory…