United States v. Ositadima Igbo, and Phillip Chukwurah

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ositadima IGBO, and Phillip Chukwurah, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 90-50406, 91-50027. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 2, 1993. Decided May 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-89-0472-AAH; A. Andrew Hauk, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: BROWNING, HUG, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants Phillip Chukwurah and Ositadima Igbo challenge their convictions for conspiracy to distribute heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We exercise jurisdiction…