United States v. Paul Y.B. Hahn

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Y.B. HAHN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1993. * Decided May 12, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before GOODWIN, TANG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 Paul Y.B. Hahn appeals after he was resentenced pursuant to our decision in his previous appeal, United States v. Hahn, 960 F.2d 903 (9th Cir.1992). On remand, the district court heard additional evidence, made extensive findings, and then reimposed the same sentence from which Hahn originally appealed. See id. at 907 . Hahn now contends that the district court erred in hearing additional evidence, that the court's findings are not supported by the evidence, and that the court should have applied the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard in making its findings. We affirm. I. 2 Hahn argues that the district court should have resentenced him based only on the…