United States v. Ronald John Copsey

Good Law
993 F.2d 885·1993 WL 171481·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18486
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 199392-30060California957 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald John COPSEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30060. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 3, 1993. * Decided May 21, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CR-88-52-MEM, Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding. 2 Before PREGERSON, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges and LEGGE, District Judge. ** 3 MEMORANDUM *** 4 Ronald Copsey pled guilty to attempting to manufacture methamphetamine, and, under the pre-Guideline statutes, received a sentence of nine years followed by a special parole term of three years. Copsey then filed a motion to correct his sentence under Rules 35 and 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He argued that he had not received proper credit for time served, and that an intervening Supreme Court holding had required that he receive a supervised release term instead of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.