United States v. Noble Debamaka

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noble DEBAMAKA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50446. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 3, 1993. * Decided May 6, 1993. Before KOZINSKI, SUHRHEINRICH ** and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Noble Debamaka pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute heroin, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 , 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to import and importation of heroin, 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 (a), 960(a)(1). He now claims that there was no reasonable suspicion for his detention or for the x-ray and strip search of him; that there wasn't probable cause for his arrest; that he didn't consent to the x-ray; and that his arrest and search were the product of racial bias. 3 We don't address the merits of any of these claims. Debamaka pleaded guilty in open court; the court conducted an extended colloquy with…