United States v. Santiago Ceja-Navarro

993 F.2d 885 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santiago CEJA-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10558. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. Decided May 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Santiago Ceja-Navarro appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. Ceja-Navarro argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Ceja-Navarro also claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move to sever his trial from his codefendant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 * Sufficiency of Evidence 4 Ceja-Navarro waived his right to challenge the sufficiency of evidence by failing to renew his motion for judgment of acquittal…