United States v. Alfredo Ochoa-Ochoa, United States of America v. Holmes Ochoa-Victoria

993 F.2d 886 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALFREDO OCHOA-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOLMES OCHOA-VICTORIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-55980, 92-55981. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 11, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoners Alfredo Ochoa-Ochoa and Holmes Ochoa-Victoria appeal pro se the district court's denial of their habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , 1 challenging their sentences for conspiracy to and possession with intent to distribute a narcotic drug controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. The Ochoas contend the district court should resentence them because they did not have sufficient opportunity to review the presentence reports, which contained prejudicial statements. We have…