United States v. Daniel Gilberto Palafox-Martinez

993 F.2d 886 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Gilberto PALAFOX-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10641. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 24, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Gilberto Palafox-Martinez appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Palafox-Martinez contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because border patrol agents lacked founded suspicion to stop his vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo whether founded suspicion existed for an investigatory stop of a vehicle. United States v. Hernandez-Alvarado, 891 F.2d 1414, 1416 (9th…