United States v. Javier Perez Ramirez

993 F.2d 886 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Perez RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1993. * Decided May 10, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Javier Perez Ramirez appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his residence at 116 South Government Way in Spokane, Washington. Ramirez contends that the district court erred in denying a hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). We affirm because we conclude that, after excluding facts found by the district court to be conclusory, or a "slight exaggeration," sufficient facts remain to demonstrate probable cause to search. I. 3 On January 9, 1992, at 7:40 p.m., Detective Mark L. Grumbly obtained a search warrant from Judge Richard White of the Spokane County District Court…