United States v. Gustav Skurdal

993 F.2d 886 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustav SKURDAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 17, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gustav Skurdal appeals pro se his convictions following jury trial for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine and attempted manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 , 846, unlawful possession of listed essential chemicals with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 802 (33-34), 841(d)(1), and distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Skurdal contends the district court had neither subject matter nor personal jurisdiction in this case. We have jurisdiction…