United States v. Frederick Narcho, Jr., AKA Fred Narcho, Jr.

993 F.2d 886 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick NARCHO, Jr., aka Fred Narcho, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10372. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 13, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick Narcho, Jr., appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for transporting illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(B). Narcho contends that the prosecutor improperly expressed his personal belief in Narcho's guilt during rebuttal argument. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the prosecutor's remarks for harmless error. See United States v. Kerr, 981 F.2d 1050, 1053 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Prantil, 764 F.2d 548, 556 (9th Cir.1985). 4 Neither the prosecutor nor the defense counsel may express a personal opinion as to the guilt of the defendant.…