United States v. Raquel Valencia-Vargas, United States of America v. Mario Carrillo-Hernandez

993 F.2d 887 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raquel VALENCIA-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario CARRILLO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50583, 92-50649. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1993. * Decided May 6, 1993. Before KOZINSKI, SUHRHEINRICH ** and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 When a case involves circumstances that weren't adequately considered by the Sentencing Commission, the district court may depart from the Guidelines. U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 (p.s.); United States v. Lira-Barraza, 941 F.2d 745, 746 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc). Here, the entire offense--lying to a customs officer about the amount of money one is taking out of the country--wasn't considered by the Commission. United States v. Carrillo-Hernandez, 963 F.2d 1316, 1318 (9th Cir.1992). In the prior appeal, we held the district court should…