United States v. Enrique Villegas-Salazar

Good Law
993 F.2d 887·1993 WL 147325·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18293
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 199390-50381California3,486 words

Opinion

Opinion

993 F.2d 887 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique VILLEGAS-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1993. * Decided May 6, 1993. 1 Before NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 On December 7, 1989, a white Ford sedan driven at normal speed by a lone male went by United States Border Patrol Agent Searles as he sat in his patrol car on the meridian of Interstate 8 between El Centro and San Diego, California observing westbound traffic. His report indicates that the driver of the sedan did not acknowledge the presence of the Border Patrol agents. Agent Searles decided to follow the sedan. His report indicates that the sedan sank "in a heavy manner as it traveled over normal bumps" and that two other vehicles driven by lone Hispanic drivers followed the sedan at a similar and consistent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.