United States v. Pete Nicholas Trevino

993 F.2d 887 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete Nicholas TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30414. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 11, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pete Nicholas Trevino appeals his 21-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). Trevino contends that the district court erred by enhancing his offense level for obstruction of justice because the government failed to meet its burden of proving that he intimidated a witness. Trevino also contends that the district court failed to make the factual findings required by Fed.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the legality of a sentence, United States v. Hahn, 960 F.2d 903 (9th…