Robert E. Henry v. Wayne Estelle, Warden

Bad Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 6251·993 F.2d 1423·1993 WL 158467·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11353·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3626
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199391-55691California2,983 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

This is an appeal from a grant of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Petitioner Robert Henry contends that he was denied due process at his trial for child molestation because evidence of an uncharged crime was erroneously admitted and then followed by a jury instruction emphasizing that same evidence. The district court found that Henry had exhausted his state remedies and that the testimony in question was so inflammatory as to infect the entire trial and preclude fundamental fairness. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Henry was tried for seven counts of child molestation before a jury in the Superior Court of California. He was charged with one count of molesting a boy named Andrew and six counts of molesting a boy named Michael. Henry was found guilty of the count involving Andrew, a mistrial was declared as to five of the counts and Henry was acquitted of one count. He was sentenced to six years in prison.

The incident involving Andrew allegedly occurred when Andrew was attending St. Paul’s Church and Day School and Henry was the rector of the church and dean of the school. Andrew could not remember if he was in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.