United States v. Robert P. Aguilar, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
994 F.2d 609
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 199391-10024California25,397 words

Opinion

Opinion

994 F.2d 609 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 90-10597, 91-10024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1991. Decided May 12, 1993. As Amended Aug. 9, 1993. Rehearing En Banc Ordered Sept. 2, 1993. Sara M. Lord, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Robert D. Luskin, Jonathan A. Knee, and Catherine M. Cook, Law Office of Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Washington, DC, and Paul B. Meltzer and Peter A. Leeming, Law Office of Meltzer and Leeming, Santa Cruz, CA, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: HUG, HALL and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER On June 13, 1989, a federal grand jury returned an eight count indictment against United States District Judge Robert P. Aguilar. The indictment charged Judge Aguilar with conspiring to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , disclosing the existence of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.