Holman v. Laulo-Rowe Agency

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 6474·994 F.2d 666·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11937·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3781
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199391-35771California1,883 words

Opinion

Opinion

994 F.2d 666 Hugh H. HOLMAN and Gayle L. Holman, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. LAULO-ROWE AGENCY; George Laulo, individually; Terry Rowe, individually; George Laulo and Terry Rowe, d/b/a Laulo-Rowe Agency, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Nos. 91-35771, 91-35772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. Decided May 24, 1993. 1 Stephen A. Doherty and Donald L. Ostrem, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, MT, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees. 2 Gary M. Zadick, Ugrin, Alexander, Zadick & Slovak, Great Falls, MT, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. 4 Before D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. * CALLISTER, District Judge: 5 Appellants Hugh and Gayle Holman ("The Holmans") appeal from a District Court decision dismissing their action due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background 6 The Holmans are Montana farmers. They insured their crops against natural disaster under policies of insurance written by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.