Holman v. Laulo-Rowe Agency
Opinion
Opinion
994 F.2d 666 Hugh H. HOLMAN and Gayle L. Holman, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. LAULO-ROWE AGENCY; George Laulo, individually; Terry Rowe, individually; George Laulo and Terry Rowe, d/b/a Laulo-Rowe Agency, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Nos. 91-35771, 91-35772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. Decided May 24, 1993. 1 Stephen A. Doherty and Donald L. Ostrem, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, MT, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees. 2 Gary M. Zadick, Ugrin, Alexander, Zadick & Slovak, Great Falls, MT, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. 4 Before D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. * CALLISTER, District Judge: 5 Appellants Hugh and Gayle Holman ("The Holmans") appeal from a District Court decision dismissing their action due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background 6 The Holmans are Montana farmers. They insured their crops against natural disaster under policies of insurance written by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation…