Rudiger Charolais Ranches, a Canadian Corporation v. Van De Graaf Ranches, a Washington Corporation

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 6601·994 F.2d 670·1993 WL 176107·20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 912·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 199391-36002California1,972 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

OVERVIEW

Plaintiff Rudiger Charoláis Ranches (“the Gang Ranch”) appeals from a judgment resulting from the district court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, Van De Graaf Ranches, Inc. The issue presented on appeal is whether a merchant who buys cattle from a person holding voidable title can be a “good faith purchaser for val ue” when the industry custom the buyer observed in the transaction conflicts with a statute regulating the industry.

In this diversity action, we apply the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) as enacted in the State of Washington. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate the judgment and remand.

FACTS

The Gang Ranch is a British Columbia cow-calf operation which sells calves to cattle buyers. In February 1989, Ernest Etherton contacted the Gang Ranch and represented that he was a cattle buyer. The Gang Ranch manager assumed this meant that Etherton was a licensed and bonded cattle buyer. Etherton negotiated to buy 306 head of cattle from the Gang Ranch for $244,347.95. Etherton was not a licensed cattle buyer.

Payment for the cattle was to be by wire transfer into the Gang Ranch’s bank account on the same day the cattle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.