Forest Conservation Council v. Devlin

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 6931·994 F.2d 709·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20995·37 ERC (BNA) 1100·37 Fed. R. Serv. 1218
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199391-35680California2,679 words

Opinion

Opinion

994 F.2d 709 37 ERC 1100 , 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,995, 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1218 FOREST CONSERVATION COUNCIL, an unincorporated Oregon association; Umpqua Watersheds; John Talberth, an individual and citizen of the state of Oregon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert J. DEVLIN, in his official capacity as a supervisor; Umpqua National Forest; F. Dale Robertson, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35680. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. Decided June 4, 1993. Ralph Wilborn, Wilborn & Wilborn, Eugene, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants. Katherine W. Hazard, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Div., Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and ZILLY, * District Judge. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants, ("Forest Conservation"), filed a lawsuit seeking the withdrawal of an advertised timber sale. The sale was withdrawn within hours of the filing of the suit. Forest Conservation now seeks attorneys' fees. We must decide whether Forest Conservation is a prevailing party where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.