Alaba O. Awofolu v. City of Los Angeles Rudy Carrasco, Officer William Fox

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alaba O. AWOFOLU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Rudy Carrasco, Officer; William Fox, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56574. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alaba O. Awofolu appeals pro se the district court's dismissal, with leave to amend, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 A district court order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final appealable order. Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, Awofolu filed a complaint against the City of Los Angeles and two individuals alleging that his due process rights were violated when his vehicle was impounded and sold without a proper hearing. The defendants…