Anselmo Chavez v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.

Good Law
995 F.2d 230·1993 WL 188364·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21282
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199391-16831California1,321 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anselmo CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16831. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 16, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: FERGUSON, CANBY AND BRUNETTI, CIRCUIT JUDGES. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anselmo Chavez appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Lockheed Missiles & Space Company in his employment discrimination action under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. 1 We review de novo, Yartzoff v. Thomas, 809 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm. 3 * FACTS 4 In August 1986, Chavez, an Hispanic male then 54 years old, began working for Lockheed. Chavez was employed as a production planner; his primary responsibility was to convert engineering drawings into written manufacturing plans for use by assembly-line workers. In July 1989, Chavez's annual performance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.