Caldwell v. United States

Good Law
995 F.2d 230·1993 WL 205868·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21287
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 199392-35485California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence Daniel CALDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Michael E. Amend, Inspector, United States Marshals Service, Baltimore, Maryland; Don M. Lamb, Deputy Marshal, United States Marshals Service, Portland, Oregon, individually and officially, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35485. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1993. * Decided June 11, 1993. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence Daniel Caldwell is a federal prisoner who appeals pro se from the judgment of the district court dismissing his civil action. We remand to the district court because we cannot determine from the record whether we have jurisdiction over Caldwell's appeal. 3 Caldwell brought this action in 1987 alleging that U.S. Marshals confiscated his personal property during a search of his home and subsequently damaged some of the property. In January 1992, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.