Samuel Andrisani v. G. Keith Wisot Robert T. Devich Vaino Spencer Miriam A. Vogel

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Keith WISOT; Robert T. Devich; Vaino Spencer; Miriam A. Vogel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56527. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Andrisani appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against two attorneys and various judges of the California state courts. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 On April 29, 1992, Andrisani filed his complaint in district court naming as defendants two attorneys, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, three California Court of Appeal justices, and two justices of the California Supreme Court. Andrisani alleged that he was denied equal protection when Andrisani's former attorney successfully sued him for malicious prosecution. Andrisani asserted the…